New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 2 | STONE Hava S. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
| 3 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 1% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 5 | LI Victoria J. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 28% | |
| 6 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 7 | YUAN Greta | - | 1% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
| 8 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 9 | SU Emma | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 10 | LU Elaine | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 11 | NATH Trisha | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 12 | LEE Hannah | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 13 | HASSANEIN Toqa | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | MARYASH Samantha | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 17 | NGUYEN Ella | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 28% | |
| 19 | GRINBERG Aliya | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 21 | WILSON Isley N. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | KIM Marley I. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 23 | TSUI Natalie | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 25 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
| 26 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 11% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LEE Sophia | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 29 | CHIANG Emily | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 30 | SADOVA Olga | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | PENG Florella | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 32 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 33 | HE Lizbeth | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KHAN Alissa | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | KRYLOVA Valery | - | 2% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 37 | YEN Natalie | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | CHARLES Caitlin | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | JEONG Katie | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 40 | FLATT Sophia | 9% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 42 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 20% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | NAYAK Indra | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | CRAINE Alexandra E. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | NAYAK Mira | 10% | 41% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 47 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | WOTZAK Kaia | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | NAYAK Anika | 19% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | CHEN Celina Z. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | CUEVAS-LO My Ting | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LAGOON Miriam | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HORMEL Molly | 69% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.