New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 2 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% | |
| 3 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
| 5 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% | |
| 6 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 7 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
| 8 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 9 | SU Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 10 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 11 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 12 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 13 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | HASSANEIN Toqa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 17 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | |
| 19 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 21 | WILSON Isley N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 25 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 26 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 27 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 29 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 30 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | PENG Florella | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 32 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 33 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
| 37 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | CHARLES Caitlin | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 40 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 100% | 80% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | CRAINE Alexandra E. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | NAYAK Mira | 100% | 90% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 47 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | WOTZAK Kaia | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | CHEN Celina Z. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | CUEVAS-LO My Ting | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HORMEL Molly | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.