National Championships & July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Saber (V40MS)

Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Register

Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3518 4542 - 3016
5 - 8 2477 2664 - 2322
9 - 16 2223 2549 - 1789
17 - 24 1563 1826 - 1256

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lee, Ivan Long Island University NCAA A23 4542 3909.04
2 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams A23 3471 3071.78
3 Zirkle, James RedStar Fencing Club Chicago B22 3045 2629.89
4 Mauri, Gherardo Enfield Fencing Club B22 3016 2572.26
5 Terentiev, Max Fencing Academy Of Westchester E22 2664 2359.30
6 Robles, Julio Unattached D21 2600 2184.98
7 Dirsmith, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle C23 2323 2018.16
8 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D23 2322 1916.77
9 Anfora, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center C23 2490 1889.71
10 Katz, Jason Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 2539 1836.90
11 Pashby, Stephen Forge Fencing Teams C19 2549 1801.59
12 Babayev, Ethan Stamford Fencing Center, LLC D23 2524 1703.47
13 Dudnick, Christian Fencing Academy Of Denver U 2021 1669.52
14 Roman, Augusto Fencing Academy Of Denver U 2082 1647.18
15 Moody, Paul Salle Auriol Seattle E23 1793 1435.65
16 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1789 1301.51
17 Dawson, Todd Athens Fencing Club E19 1697 1203.46
18 Mattoo, Aditya Fencers Club Inc. U 1739 679.68
19 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1469 677.66
20 dhar, asif Capital Fencing Academy U 1268 563.75
21 Kingsley, Daniel Southwest Fencing Club U 1803 407.78
22 Saucedo, Fernando EWA Fencing LLC U 1826 360.13
23 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1444 230.57
24 Brandt, Jordan Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 1256 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!