Houston, TX - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KANG Philip F. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
2 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
3 | NEAL John P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
3 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
5 | GYURE Brayden H. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
5 | MCALISTER Ian | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
7 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 2% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
8 | THOMAS Harris | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
9 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
10 | SURESH NEERAJ | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
11 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
12 | ROMANOV Ethan | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - |
13 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
14 | BARG Jonathan | 1% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
15 | GUNDA Saketh | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
16 | MUGA Aiden | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
17 | ZHU Eric | 12% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
18 | IMREK Elijah S. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
19 | BUHEIS Alexander I. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
20 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
21 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 11% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | CHIN Dylan A. | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
24 | HOWARD Paolo | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
25 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 32% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
26 | XIONG Aaron | 3% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
27 | HOWARD Josiah | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
28 | BEATY Trace | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
29 | MA Benjamin | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.