King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 2 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 3 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 5 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 6 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 7 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% |
| 8 | MADA Skye | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 9 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% |
| 10 | KRYLOVA Valery | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 12 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 13 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 14 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 14 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | MARYASH Samantha | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | DANK Dina | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 18 | XIKES Katherine E. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | FESTA Carina | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 20 | YUAN Greta | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 21 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 22 | FANG Sabrina | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 23 | WANG Jianning | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | REN Xinling | 4% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 25 | JENKINS Scotland | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 26 | XU ALINA | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | NATH Trisha | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | MCKEE Ainsley | 2% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | |
| 30 | KIM Marley I. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 31 | JOHNSTON Lily | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HE Lizbeth | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 33 | NGUYEN Ella | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 34 | BAWA Anahat | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Grace | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FLATT Sophia | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | ALANGAD Rhea | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | MESSICK Maya | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | FEIG Sela | 4% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.