King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 2 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 3 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% |
| 3 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
| 5 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
| 6 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 7 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
| 8 | MADA Skye | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 9 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% |
| 10 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 13% |
| 12 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 13 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
| 14 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 14 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | DANK Dina | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 18 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 20 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 22 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 23 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | REN Xinling | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 25 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 26 | XU ALINA | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 27 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 29 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 98% | 75% | 31% | 5% | |
| 30 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 33 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 34 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Grace | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 39 | ALANGAD Rhea | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 96% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.