National Championships & July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Foil (V40MF)

Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 10:00 AM

Register

Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3442 3935 - 2993
5 - 8 2524 2671 - 2173
9 - 16 2002 2235 - 1579
17 - 25 1513 2090 - 1110

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Moreno Briones, Patricio Northwest Fencing Center A23 3935 3074.02
2 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club A23 3364 2961.09
3 Habala, Peter RedStar Fencing Club Chicago B23 3475 2922.10
4 Lane, Mitchell Fencing Club Asheville C22 2993 2213.16
5 Flanagan, James Twin Cities Fencing Club B22 2635 2198.17
6 Pashby, Stephen Forge Fencing Teams C22 2671 2155.95
7 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club B21 2617 1935.29
8 Tomasi, John Rockville Fencing Academy D23 2173 1750.97
9 Brown, Jason Ludus Fencing Studio E23 2215 1674.72
10 mones, jesse Lotus Fencing Academy E22 2235 1629.58
11 Zhao, Zhiyong Bluegrass Fencers' Club C23 2205 1566.16
12 Wu, Jingxiao Rain City Fencing Center E23 1873 1433.75
13 Liu, Xiang South Denver Fencing Academy E23 1960 1433.02
14 McGinty, Eli Southwest Florida Fencing Academy E22 2232 1361.31
15 Baber, Ijlal Orlando Fencing Academy E23 1720 1163.78
16 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E23 1579 1105.00
17 Saucedo, Fernando EWA Fencing LLC E22 1701 1051.42
18 Lee, David Bay Area Fencing Club E22 1537 1047.55
19 Reed, David Rain City Fencing Center U 1525 694.35
20 Kingsley, Daniel Southwest Fencing Club U 2090 615.64
21 Wu, Geoffrey Rockville Fencing Academy U 1605 591.92
22 Stoy, Patrick Denver Fencing Center U 1239 544.74
23 Holcomb, Michael Victoria Fencing Program U 1110 414.05
24 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1675 204.51
25 Kher, Amol Bay Area Fencing Club U 1139 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!