National Championships & July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Foil (V40MF)

Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 10:00 AM

Register

Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3336 3687 - 2769
5 - 8 2593 2900 - 2379
9 - 16 1962 2286 - 1610
17 - 25 1414 2090 - 1084

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club A23 3455 3130.00
2 Moreno Briones, Patricio Northwest Fencing Center A23 3687 2954.87
3 Habala, Peter RedStar Fencing Club Chicago B23 3433 2904.56
4 Flanagan, James Twin Cities Fencing Club B22 2769 2458.77
5 Lane, Mitchell Fencing Club Asheville C22 2900 2310.31
6 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club B21 2610 2089.86
7 Pashby, Stephen Forge Fencing Teams C22 2484 2043.69
8 Zhao, Zhiyong Bluegrass Fencers' Club C23 2379 1941.24
9 Brown, Jason Ludus Fencing Studio E23 2286 1821.26
10 Tomasi, John Rockville Fencing Academy D23 2085 1708.66
11 mones, jesse Lotus Fencing Academy E22 2204 1688.77
12 Liu, Xiang South Denver Fencing Academy E23 2001 1571.31
13 Wu, Jingxiao Rain City Fencing Center E23 1811 1401.64
14 McGinty, Eli Southwest Florida Fencing Academy E22 2046 1377.51
15 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E23 1651 1242.66
16 Baber, Ijlal Orlando Fencing Academy E23 1610 1151.54
17 Saucedo, Fernando EWA Fencing LLC E22 1688 1079.01
18 Lee, David Bay Area Fencing Club E22 1475 1021.52
19 Reed, David Rain City Fencing Center U 1541 808.42
20 Stoy, Patrick Denver Fencing Center U 1239 696.36
21 Holcomb, Michael Victoria Fencing Program U 1084 622.86
22 Kingsley, Daniel Southwest Fencing Club U 2090 615.64
23 Wu, Geoffrey Rockville Fencing Academy U 1351 538.41
24 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1115 28.66
25 Kher, Amol Bay Area Fencing Club U 1139 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!