King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 3 | LI Victoria J. | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 18% | |
| 3 | BROWN Emma | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 5 | HASSANEIN Toqa | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 6 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 8% | 36% | 42% | 15% | |
| 7 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
| 8 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | KIM Marley I. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | TAO Hannah J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Ella | 23% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 12 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 51% | 16% |
| 13 | SHOMAN Miriam | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 14 | KATZ Anat | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 15 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 8% |
| 16 | YUAN Greta | 6% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | LEVITIS Danielle | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 26% | |
| 19 | DANK Dina | - | 4% | 26% | 48% | 20% | 2% |
| 20 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 59% |
| 21 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 22 | MADA Skye | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LI Amanda C. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 24 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 25 | JOHNSTON Lily | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | NATH Trisha | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 2% | 47% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | LIGH Erenei J. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | JENKINS Scotland | 8% | 44% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 31 | KRYLOVA Valery | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 32 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 33 | REN Xinling | 3% | 21% | 47% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 34 | MESSICK Maya | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 36 | WANG Jianning | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ALANGAD Rhea | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | CHIANG Emily | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | CHARLES Caitlin | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LIGH Karis | 28% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.