King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 3 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% | |
| 3 | BROWN Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
| 5 | HASSANEIN Toqa | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 15% | |
| 7 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 8 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 9 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 10 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 12 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 16% |
| 13 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 15 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 8% |
| 16 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | |
| 19 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 22% | 2% |
| 20 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 21 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
| 22 | MADA Skye | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 24 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
| 25 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 98% | 51% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 92% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 31 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 32 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 33 | REN Xinling | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 34 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 36 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ALANGAD Rhea | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | CHARLES Caitlin | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 72% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.