King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | JOSEPH Willem | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 43% |
2 | LIU Eric Y. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
3 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
3 | BROWN Alexander R. | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
5 | STRAYER Andrew | - | - | 10% | 40% | 39% | 11% |
6 | PEGRAM Rafferty G. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 21% |
7 | GISLER Benjamin B. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
8 | CAI Oliver K. | - | 2% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
9 | GUO Sean | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
10 | WHITEHEAD Amir | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
11 | WANG Michael | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 11% |
12 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
13 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 27% |
14 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
15 | PO Oliver | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
16 | PATRICK Edward L. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
17 | WANG Jackson | - | 7% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
18 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
19 | DRESSEL Jet | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
20 | MAGIDSON Josh | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
21 | REZA Farazi | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
22 | SZE Timothy | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
23 | LIGOS Alex M. | - | 7% | 49% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
24 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 12% | 57% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
25 | TRUBETSKI David | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
25 | DAS Nikhil | 43% | 51% | 5% | - | - | - |
27 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 19% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | SZE Benjamin | 44% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - |
29 | AMRANI David | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
30 | HIGGASON Hugh | 76% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.