Event Center at Valley Forge - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 2 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 3 | DANK Dina | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 3 | HASSANEIN Toqa | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 5 | CHEN Ashley | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 6 | WANG Jianning | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 7 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 8 | LEE Sophia | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% | |
| 9 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 10 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 1% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 7% | |
| 11 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 12 | NATH Trisha | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% | |
| 13 | HE Lizbeth | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 14 | JEONG Katie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 15 | MCKEE Ainsley | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | LIAO Siwen | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% | |
| 18 | JENKINS Scotland | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | HENRY Soraya S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 20 | CHEN Jessica | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 21 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 5% | 36% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 22 | WU Helen | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% | |
| 23 | FESTA Carina | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 24 | ZENG Megan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LI Angela | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | NAYAK Anika | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | NAYAK Esha | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | CHARLES Caitlin | 18% | 51% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | ZHENG Valentina | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MESSICK Maya | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | FLATT Sophia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | REN Xinling | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | YEN Natalie | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | KUANG TongFei | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | ALANGAD Rhea | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | DEANGELO Annabelle | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | BAWA Anahat | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | HORMEL Molly | 42% | 52% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | DUBETSKY Ashley | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CALISTRI Ava | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | AGARWALA Armanii K. | 43% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.