Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CODY Alexandra C. | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 11% | |
2 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 1% | 9% | 38% | 42% | 10% | |
3 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
3 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
5 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
6 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 1% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
7 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 1% | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
8 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
9 | LIM Isabel K. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% |
10 | KONG Isabel | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
11 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
12 | HAYES Grace Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 13% |
13 | HURST Kennedy | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
14 | PATEL Riya | 1% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 8% | |
15 | SKAGGS Natalie M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
16 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | BELTRAN Emilia M. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | |
18 | NOVICK Mia J. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
19 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 7% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
20 | DRAEKER Margaret | 16% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
21 | MESCHIA Maggie | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | HOLMES Emma | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.