Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 2 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 3 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% |
| 5 | WANG Robert | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 7 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% |
| 8 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
| 11 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 12 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% |
| 13 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 14 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 3% |
| 15 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 16 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 18 | KANG evan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | TRAVERS Arnav A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 21 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 22 | TANG Charles | 100% | 93% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
| 24 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 93% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | FITZPATRICK Evan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | OH Aster | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LAUB William | 100% | 95% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 30 | NEWMAN Matthew | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | COURTIN Frederic | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 34 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | LOWRANCE Robert | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.