Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PO Edith | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
2 | MUZZI Jessica | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
3 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
3 | CHO Lorin Y. | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
5 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
6 | PATEL Anika | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
7 | WU Irene M. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | |
8 | SAXENA Sejal | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
9 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
10 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
11 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 11% | |
12 | DU Hannah | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
13 | WILSON Anna S. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
14 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
15 | JACINTO Jenna R. | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
16 | NICOU Melina | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
17 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 1% | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
18 | TOBIN Brean | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
19 | NARANG Maya | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
20 | KOPIJ Ursula | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
21 | ZIMBALIST Lila | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | CLEVENGER Estella | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
23 | LEE Alyssa W. | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
24 | NARDONE Anya | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
25 | MORO Diana | 60% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.