Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PO Edith | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 2 | MUZZI Jessica | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | CHO Lorin Y. | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 5 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 6 | PATEL Anika | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 7 | WU Irene M. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | |
| 8 | SAXENA Sejal | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
| 10 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 11 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 11% | |
| 12 | DU Hannah | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 13 | WILSON Anna S. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 14 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 15 | JACINTO Jenna R. | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 16 | NICOU Melina | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 17 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 1% | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | TOBIN Brean | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | NARANG Maya | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | KOPIJ Ursula | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | ZIMBALIST Lila | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CLEVENGER Estella | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 23 | LEE Alyssa W. | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | NARDONE Anya | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | MORO Diana | 60% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.