, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BIVINS III George A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
2 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
3 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | NOBLE Daniel | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
5 | TE VELDE Noah C. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
6 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% |
7 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
8 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
9 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
10 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
11 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
12 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
13 | BOLTON Braydon A. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
14 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
15 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
16 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
17 | MORRILL William | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
18 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
19 | DANNULL Lukas J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
20 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
21 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 9% | |
22 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | - | 6% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 2% | |
23 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
24 | LIN John A. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
25 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
25 | HU William | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
27 | RAI Avin | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
28 | DODRILL Grant | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
29 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
30 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
31 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
32 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
33 | WIND Nicky E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
34 | CHAN Matthew | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
35 | ZHOU Justin | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
36 | LIANG Connor | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
37 | JI Cody Walter | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
38 | SMITH David C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
39 | HUSSAIN Faaris | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
40 | YEN Darren | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
41 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
41 | SINGER Carson | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
43 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
44 | BERMAN Luca | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
45 | YUN Jaesun | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
46 | KIM Avery J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
47 | LINSKY Matthew | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
48 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
49 | MEHTA Sachin N. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
50 | MOON Sean H. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
51 | LILOV Neil | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
52 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
53 | JEAN Noe T. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
54 | POPE Nico | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
55 | BERGER Oliver | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
56 | PAN Andrew W. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
57 | LE Hayden | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
58 | JOHNSON Andrew J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
59 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
60 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
61 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 5% |
62 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
63 | LIU kelly | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
64 | YUN Jake | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
65 | SO Hananiah | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
66 | MORRILL Justin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
67 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
68 | TONG ZACHARY | 3% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
69 | LICHT Aaron H. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
70 | BEITEL Noah | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
71 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
72 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
73 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
74 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
75 | PANDEY Neil | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
76 | KOGAN Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
77 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
78 | NOBLE Colin | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
79 | TANN Justin | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
80 | ZHENG Edward L. | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
81 | ATTIG Will T. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
82 | ROBERTS Sam | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
83 | RAJA Arnav | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
84 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
84 | YANG Ziyi | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
86 | KOTOV Leonid | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
87 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
88 | XU Luke | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
89 | KIM Alexander M. | - | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
90 | LO Alexander | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
91 | BERRIO Carter E. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
92 | ZHANG Derek | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
93 | JIANG Anthony | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
94 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
95 | ALTIRS Alexander | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
96 | CHIN Matthew W. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
97 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
97 | HJERPE Wade H. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
97 | DU Gavin J. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
100 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 21% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
101 | BULL Anderson | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
102 | HOUTZ Jackson | 1% | 9% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
103 | KIM Andrew H. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
104 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
105 | ZENG Noah | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
106 | LEITH Jack | 22% | 52% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
107 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
108 | GAFFNEY John M. | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
108 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
110 | BRAR Sanjeet | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
111 | REN Richard | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
112 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
113 | REN James | 13% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
114 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
114 | YOUNG Nash | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
116 | KIM Shaun M. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
116 | MARGULIES William | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
118 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
119 | NG Jeremiah | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
120 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
120 | NIL Michael Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
122 | COLE Alexander | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
123 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
124 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
125 | JINICH Ilan R. | 14% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
126 | HAN Daniel Y. | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
127 | PANCHAL Shival | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
128 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
129 | FERBER Oliver E. | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
130 | STONE Christopher A. | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
130 | VAUGHN Jason | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
132 | GOLD Jackson | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
133 | OVERDECK Andrew | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
134 | GHAYALOD ansh | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
135 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
136 | GRASS James D. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
136 | HONG Steven | - | 11% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
138 | QUAN Nicholas | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
138 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
140 | CHENG Albert | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
141 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
142 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
143 | GANTA Vijay | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
144 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 49% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
145 | LUO George F. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
146 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
146 | CHAN Aidan | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
146 | MORREALE John | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
149 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
150 | YOU Jaden | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
150 | PIWOWAR Alex | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
152 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 13% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
153 | SCHERER Max | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
154 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
155 | PORTMANN Stein J. | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
156 | WESLER Logan A. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
157 | CAISSE Simon B. | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
157 | CADAMBI Roshan | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
159 | CHEEMA Hyder | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
160 | DESHETLER Scott | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
161 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
161 | WU Richard | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
161 | OH Triton | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
164 | CENTENO Zachary | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
165 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.