June NAC

Junior Men's Saber

Friday, June 4, 2021 at 8:45 AM

, - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 BIVINS III George A. V V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.2 6 +0.8
2 CALLAHAN Jaden P. V V V V D D V V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
3 HARLEY Colby A. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 NOBLE Daniel D V V D V V V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
5 TE VELDE Noah C. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
6 KUPANOFF Dimitri N. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
7 CHAYEVSKY Kirk V V V D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
8 LIMB Matthew G. V V V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
9 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
10 GEFELL Andrew P. V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
11 LUKASHENKO Darii V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
12 SAKHAMURI Surya V V V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
13 BOLTON Braydon A. V D V D V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
14 WILLIAMS Nolan E. V D V D V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
15 BENAVRAM Lev C. V V V D D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
16 BARTOLO Domenic V. V V D D D V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
17 MORRILL William V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
18 MCBRIDE Jackson R. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
19 DANNULL Lukas J. V V V V V D V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
20 CHOI HYUNSEOK V D V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
21 GREENBAUM Maxwell H. D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
22 SUBBIAH Prashanth V. V D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
23 ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. D D V V V V V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
24 LIN John A. V D V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
25 SHI Andrew V V D D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
25 HU William V V V V D D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
27 RAI Avin V D D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
28 DODRILL Grant D V D V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
29 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. V D D V V D V V D 3.0 3 -
30 ZHOU Matthew R. V D D D V V V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
31 BASALYGA Jeffrey D D V D D V V V D 4.2 2 -2.2
32 DHINGRA Gian K. D D V D D V V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
33 WIND Nicky E. V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
34 CHAN Matthew V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
35 ZHOU Justin V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
36 LIANG Connor V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
37 JI Cody Walter V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
38 SMITH David C. V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
39 HUSSAIN Faaris V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
40 YEN Darren V V V V V D V D 5.2 5 -0.2
41 HARVEY Nicholas J. D V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
41 SINGER Carson V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
43 HAMMERSTROM Jared V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 BERMAN Luca V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
45 YUN Jaesun D V V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
46 KIM Avery J. D V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
47 LINSKY Matthew V V D V V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
48 HONG Vincent Q. D V V V V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
49 MEHTA Sachin N. V D D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
50 MOON Sean H. D D V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
51 LILOV Neil V D V D V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
52 CAI Lawrence (Larry) D V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
53 JEAN Noe T. D D V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
54 POPE Nico D V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
55 BERGER Oliver V D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
56 PAN Andrew W. V D V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
57 LE Hayden V D D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
58 JOHNSON Andrew J. V V D V D V D 4.5 3 -1.5
59 SOHN Kevin J. V V D D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
60 JARAMILLO Tobias L. V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
61 VOCHOSKA Aidan F. D V V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
62 MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. D D V V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
63 LIU kelly D V D D D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
64 YUN Jake D V V D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
65 SO Hananiah V V D V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
66 MORRILL Justin V V D V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
67 LAI Adam J. V V V V D V D 4.4 5 +0.6
68 TONG ZACHARY V V V V D V D 2.5 5 +2.5
69 LICHT Aaron H. D V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
70 BEITEL Noah V D D V V V D 1.2 4 +2.8
71 BARNETT Adam V V V V D D D 4.4 4 -0.4
72 TRAVERS Samir T. D V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
73 GREEN IV James (Bud) V V D V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
74 WOOD Elden S. V D V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
75 PANDEY Neil V V V V D D D 1.4 4 +2.6
76 KOGAN Benjamin D V V V V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
77 BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. V V D V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
78 NOBLE Colin V D V V V D D 2.3 4 +1.7
79 TANN Justin V D V V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
80 ZHENG Edward L. V V D V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
81 ATTIG Will T. V V V D D D 3.9 3 -0.9
82 ROBERTS Sam V V D D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
83 RAJA Arnav D D V V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
84 SIMAK Joseph P. V V D D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
84 YANG Ziyi D V D V V D D 3.0 3 -
86 KOTOV Leonid D D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
87 MAKLIN Edward P. V D D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
88 XU Luke V D V V D D D 3.0 3 -
89 KIM Alexander M. D V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
90 LO Alexander D V V D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
91 BERRIO Carter E. V V D V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
92 ZHANG Derek V D D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
93 JIANG Anthony V V V D D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
94 ERACHSHAW Taras P. V D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
95 ALTIRS Alexander V D D V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
96 CHIN Matthew W. D V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
97 GREENBAUM Ian L. D V D V V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
97 HJERPE Wade H. V D V D D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
97 DU Gavin J. V D V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
100 MCCARTHY Gabriel V D V V D D D 1.3 3 +1.7
101 BULL Anderson V D D V V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
102 HOUTZ Jackson V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
103 KIM Andrew H. V D V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
104 MAHONEY Colin M. D V D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
105 ZENG Noah D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
106 LEITH Jack D D V D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
107 BUKOWSKI Bronson D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
108 GAFFNEY John M. D V D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
108 NAZLYMOV Andrei D D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
110 BRAR Sanjeet V D D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
111 REN Richard D D V V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
112 JOHNSON Langston C. V D D D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
113 REN James V D V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
114 HOLMES Aiden G. D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
114 YOUNG Nash D D D V V D D 3.9 2 -1.9
116 KIM Shaun M. D V D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
116 MARGULIES William D V D V D D D 2.0 2 -
118 LOPEZ Lucas M. V D V D D D D 0.7 2 +1.3
119 NG Jeremiah D D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
120 KUSHKOV Simon O. V D D V D D D 5.2 2 -3.2
120 NIL Michael Y. D D V D D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
122 COLE Alexander D D V V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
123 JEFFORDS Alexander D D V D D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
124 ATANASSOV Vasil V. D V V D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
125 JINICH Ilan R. D V D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
126 HAN Daniel Y. D D V D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
127 PANCHAL Shival D D D D V V D 0.8 1 +0.2
128 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. D V D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
129 FERBER Oliver E. D D V V D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
130 STONE Christopher A. D V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
130 VAUGHN Jason V V D D D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
132 GOLD Jackson D V V D D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
133 OVERDECK Andrew V D D D V D D 2.0 2 -
134 GHAYALOD ansh V D D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
135 EICHHORN Lukas H. D D V V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
136 GRASS James D. D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
136 HONG Steven D D V D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
138 QUAN Nicholas D V D D D D 3.9 1 -2.9
138 SCHWINN Maxwell D. D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
140 CHENG Albert D D D D D V 1.0 1 -
141 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
142 RESHEIDAT Malik D V D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
143 GANTA Vijay D D D D D V 2.9 1 -1.9
144 ALTIRS Giorgio V D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
145 LUO George F. D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
146 PETRAMALE Samuel J. V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
146 CHAN Aidan D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
146 MORREALE John D D D D V D 3.0 1 -2.0
149 EDELMAN Seth A. D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
150 YOU Jaden D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
150 PIWOWAR Alex D D D D D V 0.8 1 +0.2
152 LIU Mingyang Ryan D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
153 SCHERER Max D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
154 GILMORE Thomas W. D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8
155 PORTMANN Stein J. D D D D D D 3.2 0 -3.2
156 WESLER Logan A. D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8
157 CAISSE Simon B. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
157 CADAMBI Roshan D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
159 CHEEMA Hyder D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
160 DESHETLER Scott D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
161 BUKOWSKI Broghan J. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
161 WU Richard D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
161 OH Triton D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
164 CENTENO Zachary D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
165 SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.