, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 2 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
| 3 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 3 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 5 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 6 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 7 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% |
| 8 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
| 9 | MCLANE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 10 | HU Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 19% | |
| 11 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 12 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 13 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 13 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 17% | |
| 15 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | |
| 16 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 17 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 18 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 20 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 21 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 22 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 24 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 25 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 26 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 27 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 28 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 30 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 31 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | |
| 32 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 33 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 34 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 35 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 36 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% | |
| 37 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 38 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 9% | |
| 39 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 27% | |
| 41 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 43 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 45 | MAO Amy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 47 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 48 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 49 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 51 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 52 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 54 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | YOU Emily | 100% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 57 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 58 | SHEN Stephanie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 60 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 61 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | GAO Judy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 64 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 98% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 65 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 66 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 67 | YU Sheerea | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | |
| 69 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 70 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 71 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 72 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 73 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 75 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 76 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 77 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 78 | LIN Waiyuk | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 3% | |
| 79 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 80 | SANTA Bianca Estefania | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 81 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 95% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 82 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 83 | MESCHIA Maggie | 100% | 96% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 84 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 85 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 86 | YOON Katherine | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 88 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 89 | LI Alisha | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 91 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | LU Junyao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 93 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 94 | CAI Catelynn | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 95 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 96 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 97 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 6% | - | |
| 98 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 99 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 100 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 101 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 102 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 103 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 104 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 105 | JAMES Josephine | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 12% | 1% | |
| 106 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 107 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 97% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 108 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 109 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 110 | COSTA Leah | 100% | 83% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 111 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 112 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 113 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 114 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 115 | GELMAN Emily | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 116 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 56% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 117 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 118 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 119 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 120 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 121 | WELLS Emily | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 122 | LORENZO Isabella | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.