, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 2 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 3 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 3 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 5 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 6 | JI Cody Walter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 7 | SAKHAMURI Surya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 8 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 9 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 10 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 11 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 12 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 18% | |
| 15 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 16 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 26% |
| 18 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 19 | SO Hananiah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | |
| 20 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 21 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 21 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 23 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 25 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 26 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
| 27 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 29 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 31 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 32 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 33 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 34 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
| 36 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 37 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 38 | LE Hayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 39 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
| 42 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 43 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 44 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 45 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | YOUNG Nash | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 46 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 46 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 49 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 50 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 51 | POPE Nico | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 52 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 53 | HJERPE Wade H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 2% |
| 54 | LIU kelly | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 55 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 56 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 57 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 59 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 60 | KIM Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | BEITEL Noah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 62 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 63 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 64 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 65 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 66 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 67 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 68 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 69 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 70 | LO Alexander | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 71 | REN Richard | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 73 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 74 | CHEEMA Hyder | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 75 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 76 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 77 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
| 78 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 79 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 80 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 81 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 82 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 83 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 84 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 99% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 85 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 86 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 87 | HUCHWAJDA Marcel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 88 | OH Triton | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 90 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 91 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 92 | YOU Jaden | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | WU Richard | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 95 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
| 96 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 97 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 98 | YUN Jake | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 98 | XU Luke | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 100 | LUTHRA Arjun | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 101 | REN James | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 102 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
| 103 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 91% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 105 | SCHARDINE James | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 106 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 107 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 108 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 109 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 110 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 111 | NIL Michael Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 112 | LEE Justin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 113 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 114 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 115 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 116 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 117 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 118 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 119 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 121 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 122 | FERBER Oliver E. | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 123 | BECKER Dylan J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 123 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 125 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 126 | HONG Steven | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 127 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 127 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 129 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 130 | FORT David | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 131 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 132 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 133 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 134 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 135 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 136 | VAUGHN Jason | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 137 | MCCONNELL Grady | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 138 | CADAMBI Roshan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 139 | JANG Junhyuk | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 140 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 141 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 142 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 143 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 144 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 145 | WALKE Devin | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 146 | LICHT Aaron H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 146 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 148 | MICHNA Colin P. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 149 | BONN-ELCHONESS Peter | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 150 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 151 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 152 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 153 | COHEN Charlie | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 153 | ARMOUR Malachi | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.