, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 2 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 3 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 3 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 5 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 17% |
| 6 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 7 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 8 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 9 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 10 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 11 | KONG Vera | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 12 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 13 | JOHNSON Honor B. | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% | |
| 14 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 15 | KIM Zoe | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 16 | CODY Alexandra C. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | THEODORE Maria A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 17 | TONG Kunling | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 19 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 20 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 21 | OISHI Megumi | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 22 | JULIEN Michelle | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - | |
| 24 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% | |
| 25 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 26 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHAN Casey | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 28 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 29 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | HARRILL Gillian N. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 31 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 5% |
| 32 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 14% | |
| 33 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 50% | |
| 35 | MIKA Veronica | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 36 | GORMAN Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 37 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 38 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 39 | TAO Hannah J. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 41 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% |
| 42 | YANG Ashley M. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BLUM Leah I. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | BOIS Adele | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | CAO Stephanie X. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% | |
| 46 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 47 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 47 | TZOU Alexandra | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 52 | SHEALY Maggie | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | BROWNE Alexis G. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | SHOMAN Miriam | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | STONE Hava S. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 58 | GORMLEY Arwen E. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 59 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 60 | CHIOLDI Mina | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 61 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 63 | YODER Bridget H. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LI Victoria J. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 65 | DRAGON Rainer | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 66 | LI Amanda C. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 67 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 68 | HONE Katarina G. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 69 | VESTEL Mira B. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 70 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 72 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 73 | WU Erica L. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LU Elaine | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 76 | HURST Kennedy | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 27% | 44% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 79 | JUNG Irene | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 81 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 82 | NI Sharon | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | BROWN Emma | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 84 | YONG Erika E. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 85 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | HILD Nisha | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 87 | CHEN Xinyan | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | LU Amy | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | XI Shining | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 90 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 9% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 91 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 92 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | - | |
| 93 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | TUCKER Iman R. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 95 | MOYA Keona L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 96 | LIU Rachel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 97 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | DANK Dina | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | KALRA Himani V. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 100 | AKARD Micah M. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 101 | ATLURI Sara V. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | YUN Maya | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 103 | CHANG Emily | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 104 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 105 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 106 | SZETO Chloe | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 107 | HOLMES Emma | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 108 | BILILIES Sophia | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 109 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 109 | BAKER Audrey C. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 112 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | NEIBART Fiona | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.