Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 2 | CRAINE Alexandra E. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 3 | DHAR Aamina | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 3 | WANG Jianning | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 5 | DAI Olivia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 6 | JENKINS Scotland | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | - |
| 7 | NAYAK Indra | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 8 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 9 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
| 10 | NAYAK Esha | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 11 | SHEN Jamie | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 12 | CHARLES Caitlin | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 14 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
| 15 | ATTIA Jasmine | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | YEN Natalie | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 17 | GONTARSKI Rachel | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | NAYAK Mira | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 19 | ALANGAD Rhea | 4% | 33% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | NAYAK Anika | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 21 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | BUTMAN Chloe Alaxandra | 7% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | ZHOU Leah | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | DEANGELO Annabelle | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.