Northbrook, IL - Northbrook, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | JOO Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | |
2 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
3 | HEIM Bryce | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
3 | PRABHAKAR vibhav | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
5 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
6 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
7 | ELYADERANI Paxon | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
8 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
9 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
10 | WALIGORA Sebastian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
11 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
12 | KENT Matthew | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
13 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
14 | WALIGORA Krystian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
15 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
16 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
17 | SONN Rohan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
18 | MEDINA Michael A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
19 | PIEKARSKI John P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
20 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
21 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
23 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | WANG David | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - |
25 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
26 | ROBERTS Magnus | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | JORGENSEN Jay | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
28 | RICHARDSON Ray | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.