Northbrook, IL - Northbrook, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | SILVERS Noah E. | - | - | 2% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | - | - | 1% | 21% | 77% |
| 3 | SPIER Julian H. | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 3 | SHAH S Ayush | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 5 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | - | 5% | 33% | 54% | 8% |
| 6 | SCHLEUDER Aidan | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% |
| 7 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | - | 3% | 28% | 53% | 15% |
| 8 | DENNIS Ethan | 2% | 19% | 53% | 25% | 2% |
| 9 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 3% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
| 10 | MCKEEVER Luca | 1% | 8% | 36% | 48% | 7% |
| 11 | WANG David | 44% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 12 | WALIGORA Sebastian | 19% | 47% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 13 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 14 | RAMIREZ Nathanial | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - |
| 15 | GIBBONS Alexander T. | 29% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 16 | KENT Matthew | 17% | 57% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SVIRINOVSKYI Illia | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% |
| 18 | JOO Benjamin | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | SONN Rohan | 10% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | SCHULTZ Rowan | 1% | 16% | 52% | 27% | 3% |
| 21 | NIKOLOV Peter | 3% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 22 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 23 | HEIM Bryce | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 4% |
| 24 | WHITEHURST JJ | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 25 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 26 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 63% | 33% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | WALIGORA Krystian | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | CLARK Carson | 4% | 29% | 48% | 18% | 1% |
| 29 | DIVERIS Joseph | 27% | 56% | 16% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.