Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 3 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | ||
| 5 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 6 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 7 | KOROL Neta | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 8 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 1% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% | |
| 9 | YU Seneca | - | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 20% | |
| 10 | KIM Katherine | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 11 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | DUAN Konnie | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 18% | |
| 14 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 15 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | SHIH Diane | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | ||
| 17 | OH Erin H. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 18 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 19 | HOBSON Ava | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | ||
| 20 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | KOROL Dana | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 22 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | SHUM Elizabeth | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 26 | YIN Helen | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | ||
| 27 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 28 | PENG Amber L. | - | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 29 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 30 | PATTERSON Natalia | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | LEE Ji Ahn | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | CABALU Alaina | 24% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | DO Leila | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | RIECK Cila | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | TOBIN Brean | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HWANG Alison | 13% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 38 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | OTEYZA Camille | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | HSIUNG Samantha | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | KETTELLE Molly | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | WHITESIDES Ella K. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 61% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | CHOI Kailyn | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.