Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | V D V V D V | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | KHOO Lauren A. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | V D V D | V V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 5 | CHO Cameron S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | YHIP Mikaela M. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | KOROL Neta | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | SUN Ruoxi | D D D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 9 | YU Seneca | V V V V V | V | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | KIM Katherine | V V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | V V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | XU Marie-Anne J. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 13 | DUAN Konnie | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | PRIETO Sofia M. | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | SHIH Diane | D V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | OH Erin H. | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | CHO Gracie L. | V V D V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | HOBSON Ava | V V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 20 | SUN Chien-Yu | V D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | KOROL Dana | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | CHEW Alexis T. | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 24 | SHUM Elizabeth | D V V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | FERNANDES Thea | D V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | YIN Helen | V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 28 | PENG Amber L. | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | RANDOLPH Piper | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 30 | PATTERSON Natalia | D V D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 31 | LEE Ji Ahn | V D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 32 | MORADI Raiyan N. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 33 | CABALU Alaina | V V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 34 | DO Leila | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 35 | RIECK Cila | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 36 | TOBIN Brean | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 37 | HWANG Alison | D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | D V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 39 | OTEYZA Camille | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 40 | HSIUNG Samantha | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 41 | KETTELLE Molly | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 42 | MANDAP Svetlanna | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 43 | WHITESIDES Ella K. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 44 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 45 | CHOI Kailyn | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 46 | OLORVIDA Isabella | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.