Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
2 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
3 | SINGER Carson | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% | |
3 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
5 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
6 | JIANG Anthony | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
7 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
8 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
9 | CHON Taylor A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
10 | LIANG Connor | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
11 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
12 | BARBER William S. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 4% |
13 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 7% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 2% | |
14 | COVINGTON Max G. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
15 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
16 | WESLER Logan A. | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
17 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | < 1% |
18 | BREIER Satchel E. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
19 | TANN Justin | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
20 | BERGER Oliver | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
21 | KOTOV Leonid | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
22 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
23 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 4% |
24 | NOBLE Daniel | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
25 | WANG Eric Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
26 | JINICH Ilan R. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
27 | QIU Nathan | - | 5% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
28 | STONE Esmond A. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
29 | YUN Jake | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
30 | SHASHA Zane | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
31 | GHENEA George Philipe | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | LIN Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
33 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
34 | ROBERTS Sam | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
35 | LICHT Aaron H. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
36 | HASNAH Henry | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
37 | XU William | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
38 | REYES Xavier M. | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% | |
39 | LIU Christopher X. | 5% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | VO Minh Q. | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | KIM Andrew H. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
42 | ZHANG Yankun | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
43 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | BRISTOL Brijen | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
45 | LIRA Daine C. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | YOO Joshua H. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
48 | LO Andrew T. | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
49 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
50 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
51 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
52 | KUMAR Sachit | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
53 | BAUER Hank E. | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
54 | REED Samuel J. | 23% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
55 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 14% | 58% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
56 | KROON Lucas | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
57 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | LEITH Jack | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
59 | CHENG Albert | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
60 | GUO Ethan | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
60 | ARROYO Santiago | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
63 | CENTENO Zachary | 74% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
64 | WALLACE Taylor | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
65 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
66 | GUO Brian | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.