Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 3 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% | |
| 3 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 5 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 6 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 7 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 8 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 9 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 10 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 11 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 12 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | 4% |
| 13 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% | |
| 16 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 17 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | BREIER Satchel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 19 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 20 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 21 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 22 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 23 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | 4% |
| 24 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 25 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 26 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 28 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | YUN Jake | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | SHASHA Zane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 31 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 33 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
| 34 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 35 | LICHT Aaron H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 36 | HASNAH Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 37 | XU William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 38 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 39 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 42 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | BRISTOL Brijen | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | LIRA Daine C. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | YOO Joshua H. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 49 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 76% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 77% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 100% | 86% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 57 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHENG Albert | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | ARROYO Santiago | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 64 | WALLACE Taylor | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 66 | GUO Brian | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.