Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 2 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 3 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 3 | YONG Erika E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 5 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 7 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 43% | |
| 8 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 9 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 10 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% |
| 11 | KER Grace | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
| 12 | WU Lanting | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 13 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
| 14 | TANG Catherine H. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 26% | |
| 15 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 12% | |
| 16 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 17 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 18 | JEAN Olympe G. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 1% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 4% | 31% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | NOVICK Mia J. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
| 22 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 2% | |
| 23 | XI Shining | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
| 23 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
| 25 | SHIN Andrea Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | GEYER Carolina M. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG MADELINE | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HOLMES Emma | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PI Sophia | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 30 | GOMES Diana C. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | JUNG Irene | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | NGUYEN Siena | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHANG Audrey | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 34 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 35 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 36 | WANG Zidan | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHIN Elise | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KIM Sujin | 3% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BARTON Mele | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 41 | EVANS Madelynn | 17% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | HU Michelle | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | PATEL Riya | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 6% | 43% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | TONG Jessie | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 10% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CHEN Athena | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LIN Lauren | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | YANG Lea | 3% | 18% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KIM Caitlin | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | GEYER Victoria M. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIN Grace | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | TUNG Renee | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | NEELEY Leilani | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.