Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 2 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
| 3 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 3 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 5 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
| 7 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 43% | |
| 8 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 9 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
| 10 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% |
| 11 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 11% |
| 12 | WU Lanting | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 13 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 14 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | |
| 15 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 12% | |
| 16 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 17 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 18 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 96% | 65% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 15% | 1% | |
| 22 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% | |
| 23 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% |
| 23 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% |
| 25 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PI Sophia | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 30 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 34 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 35 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
| 36 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 96% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 41 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | HU Michelle | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 44 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 100% | 94% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 100% | 90% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CHEN Athena | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | YANG Lea | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KIM Caitlin | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | GEYER Victoria M. | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIN Grace | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.