Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | FEARNS Zara A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | YONG Erika E. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | XI Shining | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | VESTEL Mira B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 7 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | V V D D V D | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | V D V D D | V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 9 | JUNG Irene | V V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | BARTON Mele | V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 11 | KER Grace | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | ENDO Miyuki N. | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 13 | CHANG Audrey | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | PI Sophia | D D V V D V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 15 | GOMES Diana C. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | NOVICK Mia J. | V D D D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | JEAN Olympe G. | V V V V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 18 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | V V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | EVANS Madelynn | D V V V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 20 | NGUYEN Siena | D V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | BARNOVITZ Maya | V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | YANG Lea | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | FANG Victoria W. | D V V D D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 24 | LIN Lauren | D D D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | HOLMES Emma | D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | CHIN Elise | D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 27 | KRASTEV Minna | D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 28 | ERIKSON Kira R. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 29 | HU Michelle | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | TUNG Renee | D V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | LIN Grace | D D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 33 | TONG Jessie | D V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | WANG Zidan | D D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 35 | HITOMI Nadya | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | BENTOLILA Thalia | D V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 37 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 38 | GEYER Victoria M. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 39 | NEELEY Leilani | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | CHEN Athena | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.