Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
2 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
3 | YONG Erika E. | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% | |
3 | XI Shining | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
5 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
6 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
7 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 4% |
8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
9 | JUNG Irene | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
10 | BARTON Mele | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
11 | KER Grace | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
12 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
13 | CHANG Audrey | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
14 | PI Sophia | 18% | 44% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
15 | GOMES Diana C. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
16 | NOVICK Mia J. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
17 | JEAN Olympe G. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
18 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
19 | EVANS Madelynn | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
20 | NGUYEN Siena | 1% | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
21 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | - | |
22 | YANG Lea | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - |
23 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 6% |
24 | LIN Lauren | 5% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
25 | HOLMES Emma | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% | |
25 | CHIN Elise | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
27 | KRASTEV Minna | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
28 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
29 | HU Michelle | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
30 | TUNG Renee | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
31 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 13% | 42% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
32 | LIN Grace | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | TONG Jessie | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | WANG Zidan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | HITOMI Nadya | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
36 | BENTOLILA Thalia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
37 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | GEYER Victoria M. | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | NEELEY Leilani | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
40 | CHEN Athena | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.