Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
2 | MORALES Ian N. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
3 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
3 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
5 | JEFFERY Jakob | - | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
6 | BARTEL Jacob L. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
7 | ZHENG zhe | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
8 | WU Conrad J. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
9 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
10 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
11 | PATINO Yahir | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
12 | WOMACH Tristan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
13 | KIM Ryan Y. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
14 | LLIDO Soren | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
15 | OH Jaden | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | MO Jason | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
17 | LIM Charles Q. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
18 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
19 | WESTPHAL David R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
20 | NAM Michael | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
21 | WOO Christian | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
22 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
23 | CHUANG Kian J. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
24 | LO Hung Yui | - | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
25 | SEAL Maximus R. | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | BERK Theodore | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
27 | LUNA Emilio | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
28 | HUANG Kevin D. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
29 | GOLDADE Luke A. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
30 | HUANG Zijian | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
31 | MYERS Dean | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
34 | HARRIS Rhonen | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
35 | BERSHIN Izzy | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
36 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | WALL Peter M. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | MILLER Chance | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | EDISON Ansel | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | PIALLING Mikhail | 51% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | IGNACIO David | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
42 | DAHI Arman | 37% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | RAINS Jackson T. | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | GUO Hairuo | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 49% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | DORMAN Patrick | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.