Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NOBLE Daniel | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
2 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
3 | BARBER William S. | - | - | 5% | 30% | 45% | 20% | |
3 | WANG Eric Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
5 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
6 | XU William | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
7 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
8 | LI Joshua L. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
9 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
10 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
11 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
12 | JINICH Ilan R. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
13 | KOTOV Leonid | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
14 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
15 | SWORDS Evan F. | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 4% | |
16 | COOK Cole | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | |
17 | TANN Justin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
18 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
19 | STONE Esmond A. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
20 | LIRA Daine C. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
21 | LEITH Jack | - | 11% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 24% | |
23 | JIANG Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
24 | HOLZ William A. | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 4% | |
25 | VO Minh Q. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
26 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
27 | CHOI Jaemin | 8% | 48% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
28 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | KROON Lucas | 7% | 34% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
30 | LIN Daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
31 | ZHANG Yankun | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
32 | KIM Andrew H. | < 1% | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
33 | REYES Xavier M. | - | - | 6% | 32% | 44% | 17% | |
34 | LO Andrew T. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
35 | BYON Julian | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
36 | LO Konnor | 2% | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | KUMAR Sachit | 21% | 48% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
38 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
39 | REED Samuel J. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
40 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
41 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
42 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | QIU Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
44 | SHASHA Zane | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
45 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 36% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
47 | POFF Kainoa | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
48 | NIETO Titus P. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
48 | BYON Adrian | 39% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
50 | GUO Brian | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
51 | ARROYO Santiago | 26% | 47% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.