Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 2 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 3 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 20% | |
| 3 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 5 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 6 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 7 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 8 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 9 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
| 10 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 11 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 12 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 13 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 14 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 4% | |
| 16 | COOK Cole | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 18 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 19 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | LIRA Daine C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 21 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 100% | 89% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | |
| 23 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
| 24 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 4% | |
| 25 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | CHOI Jaemin | 100% | 92% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 31 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 33 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 17% | |
| 34 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | BYON Julian | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | LO Konnor | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 79% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 39 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
| 42 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 44 | SHASHA Zane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 45 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | GUO Brian | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | ARROYO Santiago | 100% | 74% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.