Myrtle Beach Convention Center, Hall A - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
2 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V V D V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
3 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
3 | CLICK Tristan | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
5 | TREBON Hayden | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
6 | SINGH Ravin | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
7 | MODULLA Yathin | V V V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
8 | LEE DoWon | D V V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
9 | HERNÁNDEZ Leandros | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | TIKHONOV Daniel | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
11 | CHUNG Andrew | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | SINGH Aryaman | V V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | BUI Henry | V V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
14 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
15 | LEE JoonWon | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | FISHMAN Rahm | V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
17 | CORBIN Bennett | D V V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
18 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
19 | GONZALEZ Aaron M | D D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
20 | RUIZ Jayden | D V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
21 | LIU Kevin | V V D D D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
22 | HAN Ethan | D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
23 | WANG Lucas | D D V D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
24 | RIDGELL John | V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
25 | GINZBURG Adam | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
26 | GOLDSON Tyrese | D D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
27 | CHAWLA Aarav | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
28 | FARRER Brennecke E | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
29 | DAN Rex | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
30 | CASWELL Colten | D V D D D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
31 | PAL Ian K. | D D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
32 | MCCOLLAM Isaac | D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
33 | LIU Nick | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
34 | REDDY Daksh | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
35 | NELSON Cole | D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
36 | OUELLETTE Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
37 | JIANG Harry | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
38 | ALEXANDER John | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.