Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 3 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
| 3 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 5 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 6 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 7 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | |
| 8 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | |
| 10 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 12 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 14 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 50% | 10% |
| 15 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 8% |
| 16 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 17 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 37% |
| 18 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 19 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 20 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | |
| 22 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 23 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 26 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 28 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 29 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 33 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% |
| 34 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 20% |
| 35 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 36 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% | 14% | 1% | |
| 37 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 38 | YANG Iris | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 39 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
| 40 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 41 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 22% | 2% | |
| 43 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 44 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 45 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 46 | GU EMILY | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 48 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 100% | 90% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
| 51 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | 1% | |
| 52 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 13% | |
| 53 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 56 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 91% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 60 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 61 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 88% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | SHIM Grace | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 64 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 65 | SULTER Aurelie | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 67 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 87% | 46% | 9% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 68% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | TSANG Catherine | 100% | 90% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 74 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 75 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | AIRES Julia | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | KO Claire | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 78 | MADSEN Ansley | 100% | 82% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 79 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 80 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 82 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 83 | KOGAN Alexis | 100% | 70% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | YU Jane | 100% | 48% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 85 | ALKADI Mai | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.