Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GU Sarah | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
2 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% |
3 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
3 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
5 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
6 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
7 | REID Anousheh | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
8 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
9 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
10 | SHIV Avni | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
11 | FURMAN Maria | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
12 | YAN Grace | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
13 | LEE Yedda | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
14 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
15 | LEE Rachel | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
16 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
17 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
18 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
19 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
20 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
21 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
22 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
23 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% |
24 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
25 | SUN Renee R. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 19% | 2% |
26 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
27 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
28 | YU Bailey | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | - |
30 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 1% |
32 | LIN Elaine | 2% | 18% | 45% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
33 | HESS Heidi J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
34 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
35 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 43% | 7% |
36 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
37 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
38 | LEE Olivia | 4% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | PULLEN Ayah | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
40 | YAO Melinda | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
41 | CAFASSO Natalya | 12% | 46% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
42 | LEE REGINA | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
43 | KIM Jayna | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
44 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
45 | GADDE Neha | - | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - |
46 | KORKIN Alice | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
47 | WITTER Catherine A. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
48 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
49 | YAO KATHARINE | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
50 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | ELSTON Sophia | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
52 | LIN Ashley | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
53 | HAYNES Antonia | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
54 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
55 | DAVIS Cate | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
56 | BECKMAN Ana | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
57 | BUSH emma | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
58 | WANG Angelina | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
59 | SENYUVA Su | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
60 | XU Katelyn | 26% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
61 | TSIPORUKHA Mia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
62 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
63 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | CHI Chelsea | 20% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
65 | MUN Brianna K. | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
66 | NIX Reagan | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
67 | QIAN Irene | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
68 | PHUKAN Indra | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
69 | ALI Alina | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
71 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
72 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
73 | HSIU Elizabeth | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
74 | CARRIER Meredith | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
75 | STERR Isabella M. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
76 | YERIAN Ayda | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
78 | MCCREIGHT Geneva | 10% | 49% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
79 | KINDEL Amara | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
80 | HEADRICK Ashley | 57% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
81 | READ Lyla | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.