April NAC

Y-14 Women's Épée

Friday, April 16, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GU Sarah 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 30%
2 JAKEL Sophia N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 24%
3 MACHULSKY Leehi 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 74%
3 RUNIONS Emersyn 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 31%
5 KHAMIS Yasmine A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87%
6 SMOTRITSKY Mia 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2%
7 REID Anousheh 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 11%
8 GAJJALA Sharika R. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
9 ORTEGA Ivanna S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
10 SHIV Avni 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 2% -
11 FURMAN Maria 100% 100% 98% 82% 44% 11% 1%
12 YAN Grace 100% 100% 96% 74% 37% 9% 1%
13 LEE Yedda 100% 100% 98% 84% 44% 9%
14 DESAI Meera P. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
15 LEE Rachel 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 21% 3%
16 NGUYEN Kira 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 8%
17 FALLON Kyle R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
18 ZIGALO Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 20%
19 KIM Zoe L. 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 16%
20 MEHROTRA Anya 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
21 DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
22 NGUYEN Tallulah 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 33% 6%
23 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 41%
24 ALEXANDROV Katherine S. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 47% 11%
25 SUN Renee R. 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 21% 2%
26 LUO Ashley 100% 100% 100% 97% 76% 31%
27 HAFEEZ Hiba 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
28 POTAPENKO Margarita D. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 10%
28 YU Bailey 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 7% -
30 GAURIAT Jade S. 100% 99% 88% 54% 20% 4% -
31 HAFEEZ Hania 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 19% 1%
32 LIN Elaine 100% 98% 80% 35% 7% 1%
33 HESS Heidi J. 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 17% 1%
34 PADHYE Tanishka 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 23%
35 ZHANG Victoria R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 51% 7%
36 WATTANAKIT Anda 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 7% -
37 ZHANG Tina Tianyi 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 37%
38 LEE Olivia 100% 96% 73% 35% 9% 1% -
39 PULLEN Ayah 100% 78% 33% 7% 1% - -
40 YAO Melinda 100% 100% 96% 75% 34% 6%
41 CAFASSO Natalya 100% 88% 42% 10% 1% -
42 LEE REGINA 100% 100% 96% 75% 37% 10% 1%
43 KIM Jayna 100% 98% 79% 41% 11% 2% -
44 CALDERA Lexi I. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
45 GADDE Neha 100% 100% 97% 71% 30% 6% -
46 KORKIN Alice 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 12% 1%
47 WITTER Catherine A. 100% 99% 91% 61% 20% 3% -
48 SKOURLETOS Angelina 100% 99% 88% 58% 22% 3% -
49 YAO KATHARINE 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 16% 2%
50 JAKEL Alysa C. 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% 1% -
51 ELSTON Sophia 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 10% 1%
52 LIN Ashley 100% 83% 45% 13% 2% - -
53 HAYNES Antonia 100% 90% 57% 22% 5% - -
54 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) 100% 100% 98% 80% 40% 9% 1%
55 DAVIS Cate 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 7% 1%
56 BECKMAN Ana 100% 92% 59% 20% 3% - -
57 BUSH emma 100% 99% 88% 54% 17% 2%
58 WANG Angelina 100% 40% 6% - - -
59 SENYUVA Su 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
60 XU Katelyn 100% 74% 18% 2% - - -
61 TSIPORUKHA Mia 100% 70% 28% 6% 1% - -
62 NIEMAN Aubrey 100% 92% 62% 24% 5% - -
63 KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita 100% 95% 71% 33% 8% 1% -
64 CHI Chelsea 100% 80% 30% 5% - -
65 MUN Brianna K. 100% 95% 66% 27% 6% 1% -
66 NIX Reagan 100% 63% 18% 2% - - -
67 QIAN Irene 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
68 PHUKAN Indra 100% 65% 24% 5% - -
69 ALI Alina 100% 50% 9% 1% - -
70 SMUK Alexandra S. 100% 88% 51% 15% 2% - -
71 DAVIS Elisabeth 100% 27% 2% - - - -
72 NGUYEN Jolie T. 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 14% 2%
73 HSIU Elizabeth 100% 69% 25% 4% - - -
74 CARRIER Meredith 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
75 STERR Isabella M. 100% 96% 74% 37% 10% 1%
76 YERIAN Ayda 100% 95% 70% 33% 8% 1% -
77 PATELLI Anna Alice 100% 61% 19% 3% - - -
78 MCCREIGHT Geneva 100% 90% 41% 9% 1% - -
79 KINDEL Amara 100% 68% 26% 5% - - -
80 HEADRICK Ashley 100% 43% 5% - - - -
81 READ Lyla 100% 42% 8% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.