Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% | |
2 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
3 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 34% |
3 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
5 | LEE Hannah | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
6 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
7 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
8 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% | |
9 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 7% | 31% | 48% | 13% | |
10 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
11 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
12 | KER Grace | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
13 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 35% | 4% | |
14 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
15 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
16 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 2% | |
17 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
18 | HILD Nisha | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
19 | HUNG Anna | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% | |
20 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
21 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
22 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% | |
23 | HU Michelle | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
24 | HUANG Rachael | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | KIM Marley I. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
26 | LUKER Sophia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
27 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
28 | MARYASH Samantha | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
29 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
30 | SCHOEW Margot | 4% | 47% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
31 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
32 | LIU Sophie | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
33 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% | |
34 | DENG Brooke | - | 14% | 43% | 34% | 8% | - | |
35 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | |
36 | CHANG Audrey | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
38 | JEONG Katie | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
39 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
40 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
41 | JUNG Irene | - | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
42 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
43 | TONG Jessie | 43% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | BROCK Sydney | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
45 | YOUNG Audrey | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
46 | DAI Olivia | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
47 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
48 | FANG sophie | 33% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
49 | GOMES Diana C. | - | 7% | 33% | 44% | 16% | 1% | |
49 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
51 | HUAI Delilah | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
52 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | |
53 | MCKEE Brynnley | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
54 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
55 | SHEARER Alena | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
56 | CHIANG Melissa | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
56 | MALEK Zolie | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
56 | YAO Rainie | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
59 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
60 | LEE Madeleine | 87% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
61 | KORINTH Jacqueline | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.