Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
| 2 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 3 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 34% |
| 3 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
| 5 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 6 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
| 7 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 8 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | |
| 9 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 13% | |
| 10 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 11 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 12 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 13 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 4% | |
| 14 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 15 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 16 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 2% | |
| 17 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 18 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 19 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% | |
| 20 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 21 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 22 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% | |
| 23 | HU Michelle | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 26 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 28 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 95% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 30 | SCHOEW Margot | 100% | 96% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% | |
| 34 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 100% | 86% | 43% | 9% | - | |
| 35 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 39 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 41 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 43 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | BROCK Sydney | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 45 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 48 | FANG sophie | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 17% | 1% | |
| 49 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 84% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 60 | LEE Madeleine | 100% | 13% | - | - | - | - | |
| 61 | KORINTH Jacqueline | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.