Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 2 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
| 3 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 3 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 5 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 6 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 7 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 8 | QIAN Irene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 5% |
| 9 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 11 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 14 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 15 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
| 16 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 23% |
| 17 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 18 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 19 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 20 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 23 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 24 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 26 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | KINDEL Amara | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 31 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | LEE Gloria | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | READ Lyla | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 35 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | YERIAN Ayda | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 38 | WRIGHT Madison | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | DAVIS Cate | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 44 | MCCREIGHT Elena | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 45 | VAN VACTER Madelynn | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 46 | MCCREIGHT Geneva | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | TOFFELMIRE Audrey E. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | NEELAM Navya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | SMITH Jasmin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | JIANG Xinchen | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | KROPP Anne | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.