Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BINDER Sylvie A. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 64% |
2 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
3 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
3 | RHODES Zander | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
5 | CHO Sabrina N. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
6 | CHUSID Mikayla | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
7 | LEE Alina | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
8 | LAM Justina | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
9 | MARTOS Sara A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
10 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
11 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
12 | HE Elizabeth W. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
13 | BLOW Iman (Mani) A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
14 | TAN Helen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
15 | JO Mia C. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
16 | YAROSHENKO Karina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
17 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
18 | CHEN Jia P. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
19 | TAFFEL sara | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
20 | KOO Haley B. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
21 | CHENG Evelyn | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 9% |
22 | JING Alexandra | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
23 | LEE Paulina | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
24 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
25 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
26 | KOO Rachel A. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
27 | QIAN Crystal | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
28 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
29 | APELIAN Katherine | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
30 | KIM Rachael | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
31 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
32 | NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
33 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | SENIC Adeline | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
35 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
36 | ZHENG Vivian | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
37 | HO Brianna W. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
38 | MINARIK Natalie M. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
39 | LUNG Katerina | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
40 | BATRA Chaahat | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
41 | KONG Chin-Yi | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
42 | JING Emily | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
43 | BREKER Anika | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
44 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
45 | LEE Bethany W. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | CHOI Lenna K. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
47 | ZHENG Ivy | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
48 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
49 | SHEN Sophia H. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
49 | KIM Katherine | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
51 | WALKER Mayah J. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
52 | CHO Gracie L. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | SOOD Ishani S. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
54 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
55 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
56 | LI Phoebe J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
57 | HUNG Juliana K. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
58 | ADLER Polly Z. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
59 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
60 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | PEVZNER Victoria | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
62 | KONG Olivia | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | PARK Rowan M. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
64 | EYER Hailey M. | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
65 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
66 | CAO Arianna L. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | - |
67 | FERRARI Christina M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
68 | CEPERO Rosabel | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
69 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
70 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
71 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
72 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
73 | NOVOSELTSEVA Elizabeth (Liza) M. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
74 | DEBACK Greta I. | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
75 | TONG Ophelia | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
76 | SHAW Kayla M. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
77 | LI Grace Q. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | - |
78 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
79 | KOKES Gabrielle | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | - |
79 | LI Meilin | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | CHO Cameron S. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
82 | YU Seneca | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
83 | WANG Ellen | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
84 | CHEN Allison V. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
85 | XUE Alanna | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
86 | OH Erin H. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
87 | SHEN Lydia | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
88 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
89 | LEE Brianna J. | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
90 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
91 | CHO Taylor S. | 15% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
92 | OFFERLE Judith (Jude) A. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
93 | SEAL Julie T. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
94 | ATLURI Srija | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
95 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.