Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JEAN Noe T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | LAI Adam J. | V V D V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 5 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | BARNETT Adam | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | FERRIS George H. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 9 | GHOSH Tuhin | V V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | WESLER Logan A. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | YAO Jonathan | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | QUAN Nicholas | V D V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | REYES Kyle | D V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | EDELMAN Seth A. | D D V V V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 15 | SIMAK Joseph P. | D V D V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 16 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | D D V D V D | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | OVERDECK Andrew | V V V V V V | D | 2.7 | 6 | +3.3 |
| 18 | SHI Andrew | V V V V D V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 19 | NG Jeremiah | D V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | HAN Daniel Y. | V D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | GREENE Alexander J. | V D V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | LEVIN Mark A. | V V D D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 22 | ZHOU Miles | V D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | ALTIRS Alexander | D V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 25 | LO Alexander | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 26 | GHENEA George Philipe | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | DENG Andrew | D D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 28 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | V D D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 29 | COLE Alexander | V D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 30 | CORTEZ Christopher | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | YU Thomas | D D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | OH Triton | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | HU Andrew | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 36 | PIWOWAR Alex | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 37 | CHON Taylor A. | V D V D D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 37 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 39 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | LEE Aydan J. | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 41 | PANCHAL Shival | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 42 | BURDAN Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.