Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
| 2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 3 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 5 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 6 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 7 | FERRIS George H. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 8 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 9 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | WESLER Logan A. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 11 | YAO Jonathan | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 9% |
| 12 | QUAN Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
| 13 | REYES Kyle | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | OVERDECK Andrew | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 19 | NG Jeremiah | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HAN Daniel Y. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | GREENE Alexander J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 9% |
| 22 | ZHOU Miles | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 24 | ALTIRS Alexander | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | LO Alexander | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 26 | GHENEA George Philipe | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | DENG Andrew | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 28 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | COLE Alexander | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | CORTEZ Christopher | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | YU Thomas | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | GEORGE Daniel | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | OH Triton | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HU Andrew | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | PIWOWAR Alex | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Aydan J. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 41 | PANCHAL Shival | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BURDAN Gabriel | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.