Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 2 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% |
| 3 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% |
| 5 | CANDESCU Diana | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 6 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% |
| 7 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 8 | EYER Hailey M. | 2% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% | |
| 9 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 10 | LI Meilin | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 11 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 12 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
| 13 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% |
| 14 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 34% | 4% |
| 15 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% | |
| 17 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 5% |
| 18 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 10% |
| 19 | TAN Clarisse | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 20 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 7% | 39% | 40% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 7% |
| 22 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 2% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 10% | 40% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | HUANG NATALIE | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | YU Lauren C. | 1% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | WU Julianna Y. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | 4% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | GU Emily | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | WEBB Ella | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LEE Ariana | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 32 | KIM April | 47% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 31% |
| 34 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | OH Erin H. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 36 | SU Michelle | 4% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | 18% | 48% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 38 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | WANG Ashley | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LIU Sophia | 8% | 54% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 35% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | XIANG Emma | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HOWELL Jocelyn | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | OETZEL Taylor | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.