Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | WITTE Vera | V D D V D | V V V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 3 | SMITH Grace L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | GU Sarah | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 5 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 6 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | PAPADAKIS Lily | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | LONG Cindy | V V D D | V V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 9 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 10 | IGOE Nirali B. | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 11 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | D V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 12 | REID Anousheh | V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 13 | GAO Judy | V V D D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | SZEWC Alexandra | V D D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | DESAI Meera P. | D V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | HICKS Grace | D D D D D | V V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 17 | SMUK Daria A. | V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 18 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | LEE kyungmin | V D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | NI Emma | V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | ZENG Katrina | V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 22 | CHENG Ava | V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | MUTAKABBIR amira | V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | HU Chelsea | D D V V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 25 | LIN Elaine | V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | YANG Chloe | D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | TOLBA Salma | D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 28 | PALANSKI Cate | V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 29 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | SHU Youshan | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | HAFEEZ Hania | D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 34 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 36 | LEE Yedda | D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 37 | LI Alisha | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 38 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 39 | HAFEEZ Hiba | D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 40 | LAMBERT Camille L. | D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 41 | CHANG Ella | D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 42 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 43 | UCLES Giovanna | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 44 | KIM Lynne | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 45 | BLANCHARD Remy | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.