Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 2 | WITTE Vera | 3% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 3 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 3 | GU Sarah | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 5 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 6 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 7 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 8 | LONG Cindy | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
| 9 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 42% | 5% |
| 10 | IGOE Nirali B. | - | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% |
| 11 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | REID Anousheh | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 13 | GAO Judy | - | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | SZEWC Alexandra | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 15 | DESAI Meera P. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | HICKS Grace | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 18 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 19 | LEE kyungmin | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 20 | NI Emma | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 21 | ZENG Katrina | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | CHENG Ava | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 23 | MUTAKABBIR amira | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 24 | HU Chelsea | 6% | 49% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LIN Elaine | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | YANG Chloe | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | TOLBA Salma | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
| 28 | PALANSKI Cate | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 29 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 30 | SHU Youshan | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 21% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 11% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | HAFEEZ Hania | 7% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 34 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 35 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | |
| 36 | LEE Yedda | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 37 | LI Alisha | 2% | 40% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | |
| 39 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | LAMBERT Camille L. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHANG Ella | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 43 | UCLES Giovanna | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | KIM Lynne | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | BLANCHARD Remy | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.