Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANDESCU Diana | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 2 | HOSONO Rei W. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% |
| 3 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 3 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 5 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 6 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% |
| 8 | ZHANG Alina C. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 9 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 10 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 11 | OH Erin H. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 12 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% |
| 13 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 14 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
| 16 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 11% | |
| 17 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 47% | 26% |
| 18 | HE Fenghuan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 19 | HECKMANN Emma | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 20 | WU Julianna Y. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 22 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 4% | |
| 23 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 24 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 25 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | YU Lauren C. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | WU Irene M. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 31 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 10% | 41% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | SU Michelle | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | LEE Ariana | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | WEBB Ella | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | GU Emily | 2% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | XIANG Emma | 6% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | TAN Clarisse | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | MAO Rebecca J. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | PAVE Claire | 15% | 56% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Ashley | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | HUANG NATALIE | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 47 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | ZHOU Catherine | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 50 | MEYER Claudia | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | LEE Kaitlyn | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | WATERS Samantha M. | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ROMANO Megan C. | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.