Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HAFEEZ Hania | D V V V D | V V V V V | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 2 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | TOLBA Salma | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 3 | DESAI Meera P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | PAPADAKIS Lily | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 8 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | CHENG Ava | D V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 11 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | LI Alisha | V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 13 | YANG Alisa | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 15 | ZENG Katrina | V D D D V | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 16 | YOU Emily | D V D D D D | V V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 17 | MUTAKABBIR amira | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | HICKS Grace | V V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 19 | KANEVSKY Samantha | V D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 20 | DE JAGER Celine | D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | LEE Yedda | D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | D V V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 24 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | SHU Youshan | D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | HU Chelsea | D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | YANG Chloe | D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 28 | HAFEEZ Hiba | V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | PALANSKI Cate | V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 30 | BOWIE Charlotta | V D D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 31 | CHANG Ella | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 32 | UCLES Giovanna | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | BANKULLA Misha R. | D D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | LATORA Jordan | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 35 | HAMILTON Nina M. | V D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 36 | GANGEMI Julia | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 37 | KIM Lynne | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 38 | DREYER Nadia S. | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.