Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 2 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% | |
| 3 | TOLBA Salma | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 3 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 5 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 6 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 7 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 8 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 9 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 10 | CHENG Ava | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 11 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 12 | LI Alisha | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | YANG Alisa | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 14 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 6% | 48% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | ZENG Katrina | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | YOU Emily | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | MUTAKABBIR amira | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 18 | HICKS Grace | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 19 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | DE JAGER Celine | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 21 | LEE Yedda | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 22 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 24 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SHU Youshan | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | HU Chelsea | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | YANG Chloe | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | |
| 28 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | PALANSKI Cate | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 30 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | CHANG Ella | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | UCLES Giovanna | 27% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LATORA Jordan | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | GANGEMI Julia | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | KIM Lynne | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | DREYER Nadia S. | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.