Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LAI Adam J. | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
2 | KARAM Tariq A. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | SHI Andrew | V V D V D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
3 | MORRILL Justin | D D V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
5 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
5 | CHON Taylor A. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
7 | CHAN Matthew | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
8 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
9 | GEFELL Andrew P. | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
10 | BARNETT Adam | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
11 | WONG Ryan | V V D V V | V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
12 | HO Kaden M. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
13 | MORRILL William | D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
13 | DENG Andrew | D V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
15 | QUAN Nicholas | V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
16 | GHENEA George Philipe | D V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
17 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
18 | COLE Alexander | V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
19 | SIMAK Joseph P. | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
20 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
21 | GETS Matthew D. | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
22 | CHEN Evan P. | V V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
23 | ZENG Noah | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
24 | YEN Preston | D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
25 | FERRIS George H. | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
25 | HUANG Tyler T. | V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
27 | GHOSH Tuhin | V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
27 | HONG Vincent Q. | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
29 | KIM Matthew | V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
30 | CORTEZ Christopher | V V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
31 | SANDERS Samuel B. | V D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
32 | YAO Jonathan | D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
33 | ARROYO RIVERA JOSE M. | D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
34 | RAUSCHER Ryan | D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
35 | ZHOU Miles | V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
36 | KNISPEL-HEYWORTH Rafael | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
37 | PIWOWAR Alex | V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | MATSUI Alen K. | D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
39 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
40 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
41 | LEVIN Mark A. | D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
42 | REYES Kyle | V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
43 | OVERDECK Andrew | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
44 | JANG Junhyuk | D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
45 | OH Triton | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
46 | HAN Daniel Y. | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
47 | LEE Aydan J. | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
47 | YUAN Kevin | D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
49 | PANDEY Neil | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
49 | GEORGE Daniel | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
51 | WU Yiyang | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | KIM Shaun M. | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
53 | HU Andrew | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
54 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
55 | LIU Yizhe | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
56 | LO Alexander | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
57 | NG Jeremiah | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
58 | LEUNG Nathan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
59 | YU Thomas | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
59 | YU Limin | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.